Thursday, August 7, 2008

From cab drollery and Our Ms. Brooks

Worth It?:

"But there's no international law precedent for viewing the provision of material support for terrorism as a 'war crime.'"

Odd, but that was exactly what I thought when I read about the verdict. Are they making this stuff up as they go along? What is 'material support' and how is it defined? Is it money? Action of some kind? Or just a wrong thought?

No comments:

Post a Comment