The Sacramento City Council passed an anti war resolution recently and it seems that the wacko right wing is now quite incensed…angry enough to send threatening e-mail to the Council members.
“The e-mails are very personal in their attacks, according to council members.
"They start with a four-letter word. They don't end with it. They start with it. They're so angry at us," said Councilman Ray Tretheway.
Other comments that are made in the e-mails include: "you should be hanged" and "hope your children are beheaded."
"They talk about cutting our heads off, my head off. They say some very vile, dirty things," Tretheway said.”
I suppose you could excuse the writers…they just seem to be exceptionally “Patriotic” and probably didn’t really mean to say some of those things…
The sad truth is that if the people we are fighting had their way they would behead the city councilors.......
ReplyDeleteThe wacko left seems to miss that point. While Hollywood (and the left) decry the war they still want to live perverted lifestyles and have the freedoms that sicken the Muslim world.
Here in Maine the Wacko left just attacked the personal homes of some developers, they even trashed a home that was a historical landmark (and unrelated to the developers).
Gotta love the 1st amendment.
Actually you have to love all of the amendments plus the original documents. And all of those words give us (all of us) the right to say and think what we want. Which I believe was the intent of the framers of the Constitution. But there are those who only want to hear what they believe...any dissent is "traitorous". The Alien and Sedition Act was overturned for good reason a long time ago, but those on the right are pressing for its return. Now tell me why those people aren't "wacko"?
ReplyDeleteNo steve no good progressive (meaning regressive) is pro 2nd amendment
ReplyDeleteProgressive still means exactly what it always did. Regressive is an individual choice and can be found anywhere.
ReplyDeleteWell Steve I don't know what to say, if you think trying to make homosexuality an accepted lifestyle is progressive you are on a totally different plain than 2000 years of Christianity. The promotion of any sin is regressive. The idea that legislation after legislation will make us free is not progressive. I think the difference between you and I may be that you see the left as the good guys where as I see both sides as the bad guys. I think Christian men and women should try to affect change in this world, but since truth is not relative you aren't going to see two seperate truths affecting two seperate but equal changes. If Christians, in solidarity, act their actions will mirror one another. I think sometimes the problem maybe in what the definition of Christian is. Christ say's the church is one. We are also told the church is the pillar of truth. How come if the church is one and the pillar of truth that we have so many "types" of Christians running arround with seperate truths and differing beliefs? That is probably a subject left for another day.
ReplyDelete"Progressive" doesn't have a thing to do with homosexuality...I don't know where that is coming from?
ReplyDeleteI don't feel threatened by homosexuals. I do feel threatened by those who subvert the Gospel "The Good News" to mean whatever their current agenda is. What was it that Jesus said when addressing the crowd surrounding the woman caught in adultery?
"Go and sin no more", the problem with the progressives, meaining those progressives I am surrounded by, those I listen too on the radio, those that run the UMC, UCC, ECUSA, etc is that they are trying to say what has been a sin for thousands of years isn't. The right has the same problem, they'll overlook some crooked business dealings. Perhaps by progressive you mean orthodox if that is the case all the orthodox should have a similar ideology, one where the difference is in working towards a goal not by changing what is to allow for what isn't.
ReplyDelete