Saturday, August 11, 2007

Vote Early and Often

The sweet smell of peaches is filling the kitchen. 48 ripe, and almost ripe, peaches are on the counter and in the peach cobbler that we are assembling. We have company coming; our twin grandchildren and their dad, our son. The cobbler, with a spoonful of ice cream will cap the evening for us. But there’s another sweet odor in the kitchen as well; I roasted a batch of tomatoes and then did the food mill routine. Now the sauce, with spices and garlic, is simmering on the stove. A little bit later, after it is thicker, it will go into the freezer for this winter. Of course I will share some of it with my oldest daughter, whose garden provided most of the tomatoes.

But enough of that; it seems that my dear granddaughter had some comments to make regarding the Secretary of State (California) and her recent move to decertify the electronic voting machines. And instead of my using the comment section of my flog to answer her, I thought I would start right here with a new posting on the subject.

As I looked through the news stories, the first thing I noticed was that Secretary of State Bowen was not alone in her decision; New Jersey has done the same thing… see this story. That’s always a good sign. If you’re going to make a mistake, it’s best to do it with some company. If it's not a mistake, you share your good fortune.

But is it a mistake? I think not. What is painfully obvious to the public is the fact that the manufacturers of these machines have been less than honest during the past few years. For instance; all machines can be cracked. (Note; hackers are good people. I am one. Crackers are the bad people. The press never gets it right.) Why deny it and say that your machine can’t be cracked? Of course it can! And then the manufacturers professed an inability to provide a paper trail. What? This in an age where your local supermarket spits out a receipt that tells you how much you saved on each item, how many points you now need to get a free latte and then gives you coupons to match what you just bought. A paper trail is far less complicated than rocket science and the manufacturers were simply lying.

Enough about the machines. I will do my best to never use one and so their trustworthiness is of no importance to me. I vote by mail. The All American Way to Vote! I sit down with my ballot weeks ahead of the Election Day and I actually study the darn thing. I read the voting materials and I scan the internet for more information before I vote. Now compare that to how I used to do it. After getting home from work, I would race around the house trying to find the piece of paper that told me where the polling place was. Once that was found, I would head off to vote, hoping that I could get it done and over with in a hurry. I wanted to get back home and have dinner and relax. In the voting booth, it was a quick scan and then punch, punch, punch…all done in two minutes or less! Mission accomplished, I was a voter. Democracy has been saved! See you next fall. Or spring. Now tell me who is the better voter, the intelligent voter? Me, 30 years ago? Or me, today?

Now the enlightened folks in Oregon do the vote by mail program all of the time. Hopefully it will spread in California. It did start once before, a few years back, but then some politician thought it was More American to vote in a voting booth and introduced a bill to outlaw it. The bill passed and the vote by mail program lost a few years here in California. (Politicians hate voting by mail...it doesn't allow them to focus their ad money)

Some other enlightened folks, those living in Johnson County, Kansas, a suburban area near Kansas City. They have given themselves a full week (or more?) to vote. Now that’s civilized! Day after day, the polls are open. Lots of other places do that as well. Who said it had to be done in one day?

I guess those two, Oregon and Kansas, are examples of what happens when the public gets involved with voting and takes control of the process. Isn’t it very important that all the citizens vote? Sure it is…but the public is never or rarely involved in any discussions as to how to make it more attractive. Bureaucrats (and politicians) want to do it just as it has always been done and asking the voters for suggestions would be counterproductive to that mindset.

Now, some stuff I found while researching… and some of my comments.

August 5th

California’s top election official on Friday decertified three voting systems widely used in the state but said she would let counties use the machines in February’s

Her announcement, made just nine minutes before a midnight deadline, was condemned by the head of the state's county registrar's association, Contra Costa Registrar Stephen Weir.


Weir said Bowen's actions -- along with an unusual audit in which she dispatched several computer experts to try to hack into the machines, which they did -- had undermined public confidence in the security of the new electronic machines. But her solutions, he said, would not do anything to restore the public peace of mind, especially for elections that will occur this year, such as a special Congressional election in Los Angeles in two weeks.

"I think the secretary has redefined the definition of midnight madness," Weir said. He said that while he was not sure what the impact of the new rules would be, they had enough potential for causing chaos and delays at the polls that he encouraged people to vote by mail. Aha! The solution…and if it were already universal, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Her restrictions on the use of two types of machines to one per polling place would require the printing of far more paper ballots that planned, and that could prove difficult to achieve.

"Tens of millions of additional ballots, you don't just go to Kinkos," Weir said. "The timing is way too tight." Actually, you can go to Kinko’s. And they would do a first rate job of it. Just don’t try getting them to accept a state voucher to pay for it.


He also predicted that the changes could delay the counting of votes. "If people don't see results, they start going 'something's wrong,' " he said. Start going? Maybe 1% would be worried that something evil was afoot if they didn’t know who the winner was, 10 minutes after the polls are closed. The rest of us would see it as normal. Me? I want them to take as long as possible. Weeks!

And last, this silly comment from a Republican…

"This is the most frustrating thing. Why would she do something like this, make people wait this long for something that should have been taken care of ages ago?" said Assemblyman Anthony Adams (R-Hesperia) in a telephone interview from San Bernardino County.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe it’s the Republicans that have hijacked the state budget process, stalling it for political gain. Why would they do something like that, make people wait this long for something that should have been taken care of ages ago? (I couldn’t resist.)

6 comments:

  1. Unfortunately, the media has failed you. The actual reviews are on the SOS website, if you would like to read them. After attending the release of the reports in Sac two weeks ago, I came to the same conclusion that Steve Weir did. The Secretary has created a mass hysteria in voters, leaving the local election officials to take the hit. The machines were "cracked" with source codes which are NEVER allowed to leave the escrow where they are kept. It is as if you ask a car thief to please take your keys and try to steal your car. Very scientific. Also, you can't just go to Kinko's, the paper in which ballots are printed on is very specific; and the paper can NEVER be recycled. There are actual ballot printing companies. California machines have always had a paper trail, the rest of the country is just jumping on that bandwagon (ex: New Jersey). Bowen is an arsonist firefighter. She wants to create the destruction and then jump in to save the day. Let me remind you, the vendors paid for the review, and now they will get more money for more of the optical scan machines (on top of the millions they just got for the touch-screens in which she “decertified”). Excuse my defensive reactions, but threatening e-mails and phone calls to registrar's offices from (paranoid) voters is frustrating, especially when none of them even know that she didn't do anything: the touch-screens are still in use in every county (because they are federally mandated). Great leadership...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:58 AM

    It really doesn't matter whether they were handed the source codes or not. Any voting machine can be cracked. Keep the codes in escrow. Keep them in a safe. Drop the safe in the ocean. That only represents a challenge. Remember "Enigma" There are no absolutes when it comes to secrecy.

    "Also, you can't just go to Kinko's, the paper in which ballots are printed on is very specific; and the paper can NEVER be recycled. There are actual ballot printing companies."

    And you could go to Kinko's...if it weren't for the state creating a monopoly possibility. This falls in the same category as state mandated textbooks...plenty of room for possible ethical lapses. Not that anyone in state government would ever do such a thing.

    All that becomes a moot point if we would all switch to paper mail-in ballots.

    ReplyDelete
  3. BUT - can't you appreciate a system that allows you to submit your ballot (especially for those who face certain challanges in life) and bypass the poll workers and election officials? If you don't trust people not to hack and crack and attack, how can you trust them to count and account for your vote? What is the difference? Maybe we should all just get in a big group and raise our hands... Where does the paranoia end? We trust our money to banks (with ATM machines and credit cards which hold our personal information) and they don't even face the restrictions that voting machines do. The mail ballot issue is moot until someone does something about it. Election officials praised the idea, but it was shot down by the general public in recent years. Ugh - politics. Nobody is ever happy...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous4:44 PM

    I was never worried about election workers...crackers won't be found among them! And crackers don't need to be present at the polling place while they do their sinister work. I always trust election officials (at the lower paygrades) and polling place workers.

    Credit cards hold no personal info, they're simply the keys to the bank. And if my credit card is stolen and misused, I lose. If my vote is stolen, along with thousands more...we all lose!

    It's hard to crack that mailed in ballot. That non-recycleable special paper ballot. And if you're challenged in life, the mail-in ballot has provisions for that as well.

    As I remember it, the mail-in ballot idea from a few years ago was shot down by a rabid right wing politico. The 'general public', bless their hearts...never noticed one way or the other. It's the same kind of enthusiasm they have while voting.

    Not happy about politics? It's the American Way! Been like that since 1776. If politics were perfect, what on earth would we talk about? (And you wouldn't have a job)

    ReplyDelete
  5. My job title is Deputy County Clerk, Deputy Clerk to the Board and Administrative Assistant to Elections. I'm pretty sure I would still have a job, and I can only appreciate the added challenge that the Secretary of State has given me, helping the disabled constituents of this county. Individual votes are extremely important to me, including those made by voters who cannot see, read or write for themselves. Their individualism and independence is all that I wish to encourage. I'm thankful that I work for Lassen County though (about the population size of the state of Connecticut) instead of LA or SD County!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:41 PM

    I would bet that we have just about exhausted this topic. What do you think?

    I will continue to mail my votes in and will look askance at any other way of counting those votes. And I will do my best to encourage others to forget about the polling place and register for permanent absentee status. And as always; VOTE!

    As we have learned from the past few national elections, politicians fear a large turnout. That is a turnout that they can't control and winning depends on control.

    ReplyDelete