Wednesday, January 9, 2008

But, I'm still voting for Richardson

Just got back from the dump. (Yes, it was lovely at this time of year) And on the way over I was listening to the after-the-fact quarterbacking by the political pundits. What struck me as odd was the fact that some were mentioning that Hillary became tearful the other day. What? That's what thinking humans are supposed to do. Duh! Why on earth was it even mentioned? Maybe it was because we've had seven years of leadership? by those who don't know how to do that. Or apologize.

2 comments:

  1. I keep hearing that the reason she pulled ahead in New Hampshire was because she got emotional (tearful) and that her husband got mad at some media idiot. Maybe she just got "real". I can see it now, if she wins, the pundits will only want to talk about when she appears to speak with emotion (you know how women can be!)or if she doesn't rush to have US forces take over some other countries for our own needs, it will be because she is a weak woman and cannot do the job.
    Not sure who I am voting for yet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah! The pundits...it's enough to make you want to cry. Oops! Can't do that.

    I'm really stuck now. My favorite (Richardson) has just given up. So, like you, I'm not sure who I will favor with a vote. Either one is a historic vote.

    ReplyDelete